data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aac7a/aac7a0fa01961b697b1be0719b32e69bb7995b9b" alt=""
This analogy is strengthened by the idea provided in the video I just explored. In the video The Impact of Social Software on Learning, George Siemens explained that
"social software is a very broad umbrella term that includes everything from blog to wiki to social bookmarking to tagging or folksonomy. and essentially it's where through social meets, we are able to share and connect with each other."
The Internet era enables an active learner to become more sharing. By building an online library, with lots of categorized tags and bookmarks, a learner can not only find pretty handy resources to promote his/her study efficiency and to stay current, but also provides bountiful information for ones who is in need of it. Study affairs are not individual, or intraperson. I prefer to use interpersonal study as learners' study mode today. Learners are connected together; they store knowledge in others; each of the connected learner benefits from this network, and "that is the function of the network itself" as Siemens said in The Changing Nature of Knowledge.
In this way, learners' development can be put into a larger picture, which is the cycles of knowledge development and these elements like individuals and network are essential to it. Like what has been proposed by Siemens the concept called Connectivism that
"the starting point of connectivism is the individual. Personal knowledge is comprised of a network, which feeds into organizations and institutions, which in turn feed back into the network, and then continue to provide learning to individual."
What is important for learners is to develop learning skills with social networking tools as informal learning ways.
You have developed a very good analogy because you included both the learning and sharing that a learner does.
ReplyDelete